Mark Nicholas ([info]cosmicity) wrote,
@ 2008-04-30 13:25:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current location:48098
Entry tags:commercials, saysme.tv

Your commercial on TV: $50
This is pretty fascinating. Want to directly affect the outcome of the next primaries? This new website called saysme.tv just launched, and for about $50 a pop, you can run a political TV commercial in any market. So, for example, if you want Obama to win in Indiana, you could buy an ad and run it on CNN for $50 to help him out. Choose from their pre-made ads, or you can make your own commercial and upload it. You can put commercials on many cable networks, from MTV to Fox News to Comedy Central.

http://www.saysme.tv

That's pretty amazing. I've never seen a direct line from ordinary people to television like that before. I'm sure it's just a matter of a few months before they either expand this site to include ANY content (not just political) or someone copies this idea and expands it to include anything.

I like this. Not only does it give regular people a voice (instead of just the rich candidates themselves), but it is potentially an excellent opportunity for the "very little guy" trying to give his business a boost.

-m


(Read 7 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]serpent_sky
2008-04-30 07:40 pm UTC (link)
I want to work for the real renegade companies, as well. It's where I would be best suited. What I am doing now? Selling ringtones? Ugh. It's just a means to an end at this point -- a way to keep insurance and have a job when we move to California.

You're dead-on about the essence of a viral campaign. I've come up with ideas [and even the best ideas are a crapshoot at best...] that they shot down because they were "controversial" or "offensive" -- completely missing the point that you either have controversial, offensive, or funny -- and usually some manner of combination of the three -- in the viral world. And it's harder than it was in the past to even make it big this way.

Burger King is a great example, though. They take risks, and their agency is amazing. That's the kind of work I'd love to do. Anyone who would sign off on "Subservient Chicken" is my kind of company.

I read a long piece once about how, for the most part, campaigns like that have no value to most companies. The example they used was actually car companies. To paraphrase: "no matter how successful a viral campaign for a big ticket item like a car may be, how many people will convert and buy said item after watching the commercial? The value for a company like Burger King is there... they're selling meals for around $5. They will sell tons of them. But how many $40,000 cars will be sold? How does the company benefit?"

"Viral" is just a great buzzword right now.

My boss also thinks "video is the future of the Internet." Yes and no. When he thinks shooting instructional videos [for business plans, etc.] is a good idea... I cringe. You would do better to write it out. Most people don't have the attention span for speech/preachy videos, and it presumes that they have the time to watch the whole thing. While I can read at my own pace, a video tells me "you will spend 7 minutes here if you want this information." Click. Bye. If I click a link on CNN and have to load a video, watch a commercial, and wait for the news at their pace? I'll go elsewhere and read it in a few seconds.

There's room for all of this, but as usual, the people who stand to gain the most don't understand it fully, and don't trust the people in the trenches who actually understand what is going on and how these things work. It's kind of depressing.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

[info]cosmicity
2008-04-30 07:49 pm UTC (link)
Totally. I mean, the future of the internet probably IS more video and motion, but as you said, the internet is first and foremost about getting information easily and quickly. If you're going to integrate video, it needs to somehow be faster or far more helpful than just reading the content, otherwise people will ignore it. We make that mistake at Chrysler a lot, too. Their new thing is to put up these 10 minute demonstration videos for their new vehicles, but who would sit through a cheesy 10 minute infomercial when they can just read the car's crucial specs in about :30 seconds and look at a 360 photo of it? That's what people really want from a car website. (Which leads me to yet another common web problem: Most people go to company websites looking for those kinds of quick stats about a product, and the information is always completely buried in the site. Dumb.)

-m

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

[info]serpent_sky
2008-05-01 02:22 pm UTC (link)
Hah, you're 100% correct. When I was trying to investigate cars in Dec., the sites were driving me insane. "STOP showing me videos! I want to know how much this car costs and what it has, damnit!" I gave up on Web researching cars, at least on the official sites, because they were so difficult to navigate and they generally overlooked what I was looking for -- simple, concise information on said car.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(Read 7 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…